Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Daniel Paille Colin Greening

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Paille: Goals, 0.14 a game, 38th percentileDaniel Paille: Assists, 0.16 a game, 30th percentileDaniel Paille: Points, 0.30 a game, 32nd percentileDaniel Paille: Shots, 1.12 a game, 18th percentileDaniel Paille: Hits, 0.56 a game, 20th percentileDaniel Paille: Corsi for %, 47.8%, 26th percentileDaniel Paille: CF% rel, -5.2, 9th percentileDaniel Paille: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 35th percentileDaniel Paille: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 42nd percentileDaniel Paille: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 35th percentileDaniel Paille: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 77th percentileDaniel Paille: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 58th percentileColin Greening: Goals, 0.25 a game, 70th percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.29 a game, 61st percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.54 a game, 65th percentileColin Greening: Shots, 2.38 a game, 75th percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.33 a game, 92nd percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 53rd percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, 4.1, 85th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 32nd percentileColin Greening: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 1.00 xG per 60, 87th percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 71st percentileColin Greening: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 49th percentile
05102040Daniel Paille 13Colin Greening 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Paille
Colin Greening

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Paille L, NYR 2010-11 Colin Greening C, TOR
43 Games played 24
6 Goals 6
7 Assists 7
13 Points 13
0.30 Points per game 0.54
3 Plus/minus 2
48 Shots 57
12.5 Shooting % 10.5
24 Hits 56
28 Penalty minutes 10
11:18 Average ice time 15:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.8 Corsi for % 50.3
-5.2 CF% relative to team +4.1
48.7 Fenwick for % 50.4
48.8 Expected goals for % 48.1
-2.8 xGF% relative to team +3.1
53.3 Goals for % 53.3
101.4 PDO 100.9
68 Shot attempts taken 82
Expected goals, all situations
5.2 Expected goals 6.0
0.64 Expected goals per 60 1.00
8.3% Chance per attempt 8.0%
+0.8 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+2.1 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.3
+0.1 Even-strength offence +2.3
+0.4 Even-strength defence -1.4
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.2 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean