Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Cam Ward Carey Price

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCam Ward: Save %, 0.923, 83rd percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.49 a game, 43rd percentileCam Ward: Workload, 32.1 shots a game, 98th percentileCam Ward: Games, 74 games, 98th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, +0.50 above expected per 60, 91st percentileCarey Price: Save %, 0.923, 87th percentileCarey Price: Goals against, 2.29 a game, 67th percentileCarey Price: Workload, 29.8 shots a game, 78th percentileCarey Price: Games, 72 games, 96th percentileCarey Price: Goals saved, +0.31 above expected per 60, 79th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Cam Ward G, CHI 2010-11 Carey Price G, MTL
74 Games played 72
37 Wins 38
26 Losses 28
4 Shutouts 8
2,375 Shots against 2,147
2,191 Saves 1,982
184 Goals against 165
0.923 Save % 0.923
2.56 Goals against average 2.35
Expected goals, while he was in net
219.9 Expected goals against 186.4
+35.9 Goals saved above expected +21.4
+0.50 Saved above expected per 60 +0.31
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+58.3 Goals above replacement +40.4
+9.7 Wins above replacement +6.7
Contract
$6.3M Cap hit $2.75M
$7.4M Worth at the going rate $5.3M
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean