Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nathan Horton Chris Stewart

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNathan Horton: Goals, 0.33 a game, 86th percentileNathan Horton: Assists, 0.34 a game, 70th percentileNathan Horton: Points, 0.66 a game, 78th percentileNathan Horton: Shots, 2.35 a game, 74th percentileNathan Horton: Hits, 0.93 a game, 42nd percentileNathan Horton: Corsi for %, 54.5%, 88th percentileNathan Horton: CF% rel, 5.3, 91st percentileNathan Horton: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 75th percentileNathan Horton: Rating, +8.0 goals above replacement, 79th percentileNathan Horton: Chances created, 0.97 xG per 60, 84th percentileNathan Horton: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 73rd percentileNathan Horton: Finishing, +4.9 goals above expected, 88th percentileChris Stewart: Goals, 0.45 a game, 98th percentileChris Stewart: Assists, 0.40 a game, 81st percentileChris Stewart: Points, 0.85 a game, 91st percentileChris Stewart: Shots, 2.61 a game, 83rd percentileChris Stewart: Hits, 0.90 a game, 41st percentileChris Stewart: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 47th percentileChris Stewart: CF% rel, 0.1, 46th percentileChris Stewart: On-ice xG %, 53.8%, 77th percentileChris Stewart: Rating, +8.2 goals above replacement, 81st percentileChris Stewart: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 74th percentileChris Stewart: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 63rd percentileChris Stewart: Finishing, +11.9 goals above expected, 98th percentile
0204020406080Nathan Horton 53Chris Stewart 53

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nathan Horton
Chris Stewart

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nathan Horton R, CBJ 2010-11 Chris Stewart R, PHI
80 Games played 62
26 Goals 28
27 Assists 25
53 Points 53
0.66 Points per game 0.85
29 Plus/minus -6
188 Shots 162
13.8 Shooting % 17.3
74 Hits 56
85 Penalty minutes 53
16:17 Average ice time 17:29
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.5 Corsi for % 49.8
+5.3 CF% relative to team +0.1
53.5 Fenwick for % 51.1
53.4 Expected goals for % 53.8
+6.1 xGF% relative to team +2.1
64.0 Goals for % 52.6
103.8 PDO 100.3
250 Shot attempts taken 175
Expected goals, all situations
21.1 Expected goals 16.1
0.97 Expected goals per 60 0.89
8.1% Chance per attempt 7.8%
+4.9 Goals above expected +11.9
Rating, in goals
+8.0 Goals above replacement +8.2
+1.3 Wins above replacement +1.4
+6.2 Even-strength offence +4.1
-1.2 Even-strength defence -0.9
-0.4 Power play +1.8
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
-0.1 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$4M Cap hit $2.875M
$75K Cap dollars per point $54K
$3.9M Worth at the going rate $4M
-$104K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean