Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Thomas Vanek Patrick Marleau

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerThomas Vanek: Goals, 0.40 a game, 95th percentileThomas Vanek: Assists, 0.51 a game, 92nd percentileThomas Vanek: Points, 0.91 a game, 95th percentileThomas Vanek: Shots, 2.98 a game, 90th percentileThomas Vanek: Hits, 0.38 a game, 9th percentileThomas Vanek: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 61st percentileThomas Vanek: CF% rel, 1.4, 59th percentileThomas Vanek: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileThomas Vanek: Rating, +13.4 goals above replacement, 95th percentileThomas Vanek: Chances created, 1.32 xG per 60, 99th percentileThomas Vanek: Shot quality, 9.5% a shot, 95th percentileThomas Vanek: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 55th percentilePatrick Marleau: Goals, 0.45 a game, 98th percentilePatrick Marleau: Assists, 0.44 a game, 85th percentilePatrick Marleau: Points, 0.89 a game, 94th percentilePatrick Marleau: Shots, 3.40 a game, 96th percentilePatrick Marleau: Hits, 1.05 a game, 48th percentilePatrick Marleau: Corsi for %, 53.1%, 76th percentilePatrick Marleau: CF% rel, -0.7, 38th percentilePatrick Marleau: On-ice xG %, 55.0%, 85th percentilePatrick Marleau: Rating, +7.2 goals above replacement, 77th percentilePatrick Marleau: Chances created, 1.01 xG per 60, 88th percentilePatrick Marleau: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 68th percentilePatrick Marleau: Finishing, +6.2 goals above expected, 94th percentile
020406020406080Thomas Vanek 73Patrick Marleau 73

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Thomas Vanek
Patrick Marleau

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Thomas Vanek L, DET 2010-11 Patrick Marleau C, SJS
80 Games played 82
32 Goals 37
41 Assists 36
73 Points 73
0.91 Points per game 0.89
2 Plus/minus -3
238 Shots 279
13.4 Shooting % 13.3
30 Hits 86
24 Penalty minutes 16
17:21 Average ice time 20:47
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.4 Corsi for % 53.1
+1.4 CF% relative to team -0.7
51.0 Fenwick for % 52.6
53.0 Expected goals for % 55.0
+1.7 xGF% relative to team -2.5
56.7 Goals for % 50.5
101.8 PDO 99.8
255 Shot attempts taken 292
Expected goals, all situations
30.6 Expected goals 28.8
1.32 Expected goals per 60 1.01
9.5% Chance per attempt 8.0%
+0.4 Goals above expected +6.2
Rating, in goals
+13.4 Goals above replacement +7.2
+2.2 Wins above replacement +1.2
+6.8 Even-strength offence +0.4
-3.2 Even-strength defence -1.4
+3.0 Power play +3.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.8
+2.9 Penalties +1.1
Contract
$7.143M Cap hit $6.9M
$98K Cap dollars per point $95K
$6.2M Worth at the going rate $3.5M
-$981K Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean