Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Daniel Carcillo Ales Kotalik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Carcillo: Goals, 0.07 a game, 16th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Points, 0.11 a game, 7th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shots, 0.98 a game, 13th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Hits, 1.40 a game, 65th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Corsi for %, 44.8%, 7th percentileDaniel Carcillo: CF% rel, -3.5, 19th percentileDaniel Carcillo: On-ice xG %, 44.6%, 11th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 9th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 33rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 41st percentileDaniel Carcillo: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentileAles Kotalik: Goals, 0.15 a game, 43rd percentileAles Kotalik: Assists, 0.08 a game, 10th percentileAles Kotalik: Points, 0.23 a game, 23rd percentileAles Kotalik: Shots, 2.38 a game, 75th percentileAles Kotalik: Hits, 1.46 a game, 68th percentileAles Kotalik: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 79th percentileAles Kotalik: CF% rel, -1.5, 32nd percentileAles Kotalik: On-ice xG %, 49.7%, 44th percentileAles Kotalik: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 15th percentileAles Kotalik: Chances created, 0.77 xG per 60, 55th percentileAles Kotalik: Shot quality, 4.8% a shot, 1st percentileAles Kotalik: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 48th percentile
02462040Daniel Carcillo 6Ales Kotalik 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Carcillo
Ales Kotalik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Carcillo L, CHI 2010-11 Ales Kotalik R, CGY
57 Games played 26
4 Goals 4
2 Assists 2
6 Points 6
0.11 Points per game 0.23
-14 Plus/minus -7
56 Shots 62
7.1 Shooting % 6.5
80 Hits 38
127 Penalty minutes 8
7:46 Average ice time 12:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.8 Corsi for % 53.4
-3.5 CF% relative to team -1.5
44.9 Fenwick for % 54.1
44.6 Expected goals for % 49.7
-5.6 xGF% relative to team -7.1
25.0 Goals for % 35.0
94.1 PDO 95.1
85 Shot attempts taken 89
Expected goals, all situations
4.7 Expected goals 4.1
0.63 Expected goals per 60 0.77
7.1% Chance per attempt 4.8%
-0.7 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement -0.7
-0.2 Wins above replacement -0.1
-2.1 Even-strength offence -0.7
-0.7 Even-strength defence -0.8
0.0 Power play -0.3
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.1 Penalties +0.2

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean