Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Daniel Carcillo Toby Petersen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDaniel Carcillo: Goals, 0.07 a game, 16th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Points, 0.11 a game, 7th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shots, 0.98 a game, 13th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Hits, 1.40 a game, 65th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Corsi for %, 44.8%, 7th percentileDaniel Carcillo: CF% rel, -3.5, 19th percentileDaniel Carcillo: On-ice xG %, 44.6%, 11th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Rating, -1.5 goals above replacement, 9th percentileDaniel Carcillo: Chances created, 0.63 xG per 60, 33rd percentileDaniel Carcillo: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 41st percentileDaniel Carcillo: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentileToby Petersen: Goals, 0.03 a game, 6th percentileToby Petersen: Assists, 0.07 a game, 9th percentileToby Petersen: Points, 0.10 a game, 6th percentileToby Petersen: Shots, 0.97 a game, 12th percentileToby Petersen: Hits, 0.93 a game, 42nd percentileToby Petersen: Corsi for %, 45.6%, 9th percentileToby Petersen: CF% rel, -3.2, 21st percentileToby Petersen: On-ice xG %, 46.0%, 18th percentileToby Petersen: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 39th percentileToby Petersen: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 5th percentileToby Petersen: Shot quality, 5.8% a shot, 6th percentileToby Petersen: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 24th percentile
0246204060Daniel Carcillo 6Toby Petersen 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Daniel Carcillo
Toby Petersen

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Daniel Carcillo L, CHI 2010-11 Toby Petersen C, DAL
57 Games played 60
4 Goals 2
2 Assists 4
6 Points 6
0.11 Points per game 0.10
-14 Plus/minus -7
56 Shots 58
7.1 Shooting % 3.4
80 Hits 56
127 Penalty minutes 8
7:46 Average ice time 10:02
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.8 Corsi for % 45.6
-3.5 CF% relative to team -3.2
44.9 Fenwick for % 46.7
44.6 Expected goals for % 46.0
-5.6 xGF% relative to team -1.7
25.0 Goals for % 32.0
94.1 PDO 96.7
85 Shot attempts taken 81
Expected goals, all situations
4.7 Expected goals 4.4
0.63 Expected goals per 60 0.43
7.1% Chance per attempt 5.8%
-0.7 Goals above expected -2.4
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +1.8
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.3
-2.1 Even-strength offence -3.1
-0.7 Even-strength defence +2.9
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties +0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean