Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Marc Methot Jonathan Ericsson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMarc Methot: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMarc Methot: Assists, 0.20 a game, 54th percentileMarc Methot: Points, 0.20 a game, 37th percentileMarc Methot: Shots, 0.78 a game, 21st percentileMarc Methot: Hits, 2.38 a game, 91st percentileMarc Methot: Corsi for %, 48.7%, 36th percentileMarc Methot: CF% rel, -3.9, 14th percentileMarc Methot: On-ice xG %, 50.2%, 53rd percentileMarc Methot: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileMarc Methot: Chances created, 0.10 xG per 60, 16th percentileMarc Methot: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 24th percentileMarc Methot: Finishing, -2.3 goals above expected, 10th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Goals, 0.04 a game, 43rd percentileJonathan Ericsson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 37th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Points, 0.20 a game, 37th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shots, 1.20 a game, 54th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Hits, 1.45 a game, 63rd percentileJonathan Ericsson: Corsi for %, 54.6%, 94th percentileJonathan Ericsson: CF% rel, 2.1, 71st percentileJonathan Ericsson: On-ice xG %, 52.3%, 74th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Rating, -2.2 goals above replacement, 12th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Chances created, 0.15 xG per 60, 41st percentileJonathan Ericsson: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 25th percentileJonathan Ericsson: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 47th percentile
051015204060Marc Methot 15Jonathan Ericsson 15

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Marc Methot
Jonathan Ericsson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Marc Methot D, DAL 2010-11 Jonathan Ericsson D, DET
74 Games played 74
0 Goals 3
15 Assists 12
15 Points 15
0.20 Points per game 0.20
2 Plus/minus 8
58 Shots 89
0.0 Shooting % 3.4
176 Hits 107
58 Penalty minutes 87
19:53 Average ice time 18:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.7 Corsi for % 54.6
-3.9 CF% relative to team +2.1
48.7 Fenwick for % 53.9
50.2 Expected goals for % 52.3
-0.8 xGF% relative to team +0.7
51.1 Goals for % 49.5
100.6 PDO 98.9
114 Shot attempts taken 161
Expected goals, all situations
2.3 Expected goals 3.5
0.10 Expected goals per 60 0.15
2.6% Chance per attempt 2.7%
-2.3 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
+1.5 Goals above replacement -2.2
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.4
-2.9 Even-strength offence -1.1
+0.8 Even-strength defence -2.0
-0.4 Power play +0.1
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.3
-1.0 Penalties -4.1
Contract
$1.013M Cap hit $900K
$68K Cap dollars per point $60K
$1.1M Worth at the going rate -$428K
+$115K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean