Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nate Thompson Kevin Porter

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.19 a game, 37th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.32 a game, 35th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.56 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.46 a game, 68th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 44th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -2.8, 24th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 55.3%, 87th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +7.0 goals above replacement, 75th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 22nd percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 40th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.4 goals above expected, 16th percentileKevin Porter: Goals, 0.19 a game, 55th percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.15 a game, 27th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.34 a game, 38th percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 1.38 a game, 31st percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 1.70 a game, 78th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 20th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, -0.3, 42nd percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 40th percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 26th percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 34th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 46th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, +3.1 goals above expected, 80th percentile
0510152025204060Nate Thompson 25Kevin Porter 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Thompson
Kevin Porter

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Thompson C, PHI 2010-11 Kevin Porter C, PIT
79 Games played 74
10 Goals 14
15 Assists 11
25 Points 25
0.32 Points per game 0.34
-6 Plus/minus -11
123 Shots 102
8.1 Shooting % 13.7
115 Hits 126
29 Penalty minutes 27
15:05 Average ice time 13:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.6 Corsi for % 46.9
-2.8 CF% relative to team -0.3
53.3 Fenwick for % 47.9
55.3 Expected goals for % 49.3
-0.3 xGF% relative to team +0.6
42.4 Goals for % 44.8
96.5 PDO 99.0
181 Shot attempts taken 165
Expected goals, all situations
11.4 Expected goals 10.9
0.57 Expected goals per 60 0.64
7.1% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-3.4 Goals above expected +3.1
Rating, in goals
+7.0 Goals above replacement +0.5
+1.2 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.4 Even-strength offence -1.0
+4.4 Even-strength defence +0.3
-0.1 Power play -0.9
+0.5 Penalty kill +0.3
+0.3 Penalties -1.0
Contract
$625K Cap hit $660K
$25K Cap dollars per point $26K
$3.5M Worth at the going rate $714K
+$2.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$54K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean