Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Eric Boulton

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.04 a game, 8th percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.10 a game, 15th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.14 a game, 11th percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.62 a game, 5th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 1.78 a game, 79th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 40.5%, 1st percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -13.7, 1st percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 40.4%, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 30th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 31st percentileEric Boulton: Goals, 0.09 a game, 23rd percentileEric Boulton: Assists, 0.06 a game, 8th percentileEric Boulton: Points, 0.14 a game, 11th percentileEric Boulton: Shots, 0.74 a game, 7th percentileEric Boulton: Hits, 1.35 a game, 61st percentileEric Boulton: Corsi for %, 46.1%, 14th percentileEric Boulton: CF% rel, -3.1, 21st percentileEric Boulton: On-ice xG %, 45.8%, 17th percentileEric Boulton: Rating, 0.0 goals above replacement, 21st percentileEric Boulton: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 4th percentileEric Boulton: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 18th percentileEric Boulton: Finishing, +1.7 goals above expected, 68th percentile
0246810204060Tanner Glass 10Eric Boulton 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Eric Boulton

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2010-11 Eric Boulton L, NYI
73 Games played 69
3 Goals 6
7 Assists 4
10 Points 10
0.14 Points per game 0.14
-5 Plus/minus 1
45 Shots 51
6.7 Shooting % 11.8
130 Hits 93
72 Penalty minutes 87
8:56 Average ice time 8:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.5 Corsi for % 46.1
-13.7 CF% relative to team -3.1
42.0 Fenwick for % 47.9
40.4 Expected goals for % 45.8
-11.5 xGF% relative to team -1.7
41.2 Goals for % 51.3
100.1 PDO 101.0
81 Shot attempts taken 86
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 4.3
0.43 Expected goals per 60 0.42
6.7% Chance per attempt 6.3%
-1.6 Goals above expected +1.7
Rating, in goals
-1.6 Goals above replacement 0.0
-0.3 Wins above replacement 0.0
-3.0 Even-strength offence -2.6
-0.8 Even-strength defence +0.8
0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.1 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$625K Cap hit $650K
$63K Cap dollars per point $65K
-$186K Worth at the going rate $488K
-$811K Value: worth minus cap hit -$162K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean