Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Tanner Glass Liam Reddox

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Glass: Goals, 0.04 a game, 8th percentileTanner Glass: Assists, 0.10 a game, 15th percentileTanner Glass: Points, 0.14 a game, 11th percentileTanner Glass: Shots, 0.62 a game, 5th percentileTanner Glass: Hits, 1.78 a game, 79th percentileTanner Glass: Corsi for %, 40.5%, 1st percentileTanner Glass: CF% rel, -13.7, 1st percentileTanner Glass: On-ice xG %, 40.4%, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Rating, -1.6 goals above replacement, 9th percentileTanner Glass: Chances created, 0.43 xG per 60, 4th percentileTanner Glass: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 30th percentileTanner Glass: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 31st percentileLiam Reddox: Goals, 0.02 a game, 4th percentileLiam Reddox: Assists, 0.20 a game, 42nd percentileLiam Reddox: Points, 0.23 a game, 22nd percentileLiam Reddox: Shots, 1.93 a game, 58th percentileLiam Reddox: Hits, 1.73 a game, 78th percentileLiam Reddox: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 15th percentileLiam Reddox: CF% rel, -2.8, 25th percentileLiam Reddox: On-ice xG %, 49.1%, 40th percentileLiam Reddox: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileLiam Reddox: Chances created, 0.73 xG per 60, 48th percentileLiam Reddox: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 52nd percentileLiam Reddox: Finishing, -7.0 goals above expected, 3rd percentile
0246810204060Tanner Glass 10Liam Reddox 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Glass
Liam Reddox

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Glass L, CGY 2010-11 Liam Reddox L, EDM
73 Games played 44
3 Goals 1
7 Assists 9
10 Points 10
0.14 Points per game 0.23
-5 Plus/minus -8
45 Shots 85
6.7 Shooting % 1.2
130 Hits 76
72 Penalty minutes 20
8:56 Average ice time 15:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.5 Corsi for % 46.3
-13.7 CF% relative to team -2.8
42.0 Fenwick for % 46.5
40.4 Expected goals for % 49.1
-11.5 xGF% relative to team +4.3
41.2 Goals for % 34.4
100.1 PDO 95.5
81 Shot attempts taken 114
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 8.0
0.43 Expected goals per 60 0.73
6.7% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-1.6 Goals above expected -7.0
Rating, in goals
-1.6 Goals above replacement +3.5
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.6
-3.0 Even-strength offence -0.6
-0.8 Even-strength defence +1.5
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.1 Penalties +1.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean