Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Chris Porter Adam Cracknell

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Porter L, MIN		2010-11	Adam Cracknell R, ANA
	45	Games played	24
	3	Goals	3
	4	Assists	4
	7	Points	7
	0.16	Points per game	0.29
	-4	Plus/minus	1
	55	Shots	26
	5.5	Shooting %	11.5
	91	Hits	29
	16	Penalty minutes	8
	10:23	Average ice time	8:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	50.9	Corsi for %	48.5
	-0.5	CF% relative to team	-2.6
	50.5	Fenwick for %	47.8
	44.7	Expected goals for %	39.2
	-5.1	xGF% relative to team	-12.2
	43.3	Goals for %	52.6
	97.1	PDO	101.3
	87	Shot attempts taken	44
Expected goals, all situations
	4.6	Expected goals	1.8
	0.59	Expected goals per 60	0.51
	6.4%	Chance per attempt	4.8%
	-1.6	Goals above expected	+1.2
Rating, in goals
	-0.7	Goals above replacement	-0.1
	-0.1	Wins above replacement	0.0
	-1.6	Even-strength offence	-0.4
	-0.5	Even-strength defence	0.0
	0.0	Power play	0.0
	-0.4	Penalty kill	+0.0
	+0.6	Penalties	-0.3
Contract
	$563K	Cap hit	$500K
	$80K	Cap dollars per point	$71K
	$202K	Worth at the going rate	$454K
	-$360K	Value: worth minus cap hit	-$46K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean