Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Chris Porter Bill Thomas

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Porter: Goals, 0.07 a game, 15th percentileChris Porter: Assists, 0.09 a game, 14th percentileChris Porter: Points, 0.16 a game, 12th percentileChris Porter: Shots, 1.22 a game, 24th percentileChris Porter: Hits, 2.02 a game, 86th percentileChris Porter: Corsi for %, 50.9%, 57th percentileChris Porter: CF% rel, -0.5, 41st percentileChris Porter: On-ice xG %, 44.7%, 12th percentileChris Porter: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 16th percentileChris Porter: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 26th percentileChris Porter: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 20th percentileChris Porter: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 32nd percentileBill Thomas: Goals, 0.17 a game, 47th percentileBill Thomas: Assists, 0.13 a game, 21st percentileBill Thomas: Points, 0.29 a game, 32nd percentileBill Thomas: Shots, 1.38 a game, 30th percentileBill Thomas: Hits, 0.79 a game, 34th percentileBill Thomas: Corsi for %, 47.9%, 26th percentileBill Thomas: CF% rel, 0.6, 52nd percentileBill Thomas: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 30th percentileBill Thomas: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 36th percentileBill Thomas: Chances created, 0.79 xG per 60, 58th percentileBill Thomas: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 9th percentileBill Thomas: Finishing, +1.3 goals above expected, 64th percentile
02462040Chris Porter 7Bill Thomas 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Porter
Bill Thomas

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Porter L, MIN 2010-11 Bill Thomas R, FLA
45 Games played 24
3 Goals 4
4 Assists 3
7 Points 7
0.16 Points per game 0.29
-4 Plus/minus 1
55 Shots 33
5.5 Shooting % 12.1
91 Hits 19
16 Penalty minutes 6
10:23 Average ice time 8:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.9 Corsi for % 47.9
-0.5 CF% relative to team +0.6
50.5 Fenwick for % 48.6
44.7 Expected goals for % 47.8
-5.1 xGF% relative to team -2.5
43.3 Goals for % 53.8
97.1 PDO 100.9
87 Shot attempts taken 46
Expected goals, all situations
4.6 Expected goals 2.7
0.59 Expected goals per 60 0.79
6.4% Chance per attempt 6.0%
-1.6 Goals above expected +1.3
Rating, in goals
-0.7 Goals above replacement +1.5
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.3
-1.6 Even-strength offence +0.1
-0.5 Even-strength defence +0.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.4 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.6 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean