Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.893, 9th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 3.02 a game, 4th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 28.2 shots a game, 48th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 55 games, 63rd percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.54 above expected per 60, 6th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.917, 65th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.25 a game, 74th percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 27.1 shots a game, 39th percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 57 games, 67th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.11 above expected per 60, 66th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2010-11 Corey Crawford G, CHI
55 Games played 57
15 Wins 33
27 Losses 18
3 Shutouts 4
1,551 Shots against 1,545
1,385 Saves 1,417
166 Goals against 128
0.893 Save % 0.917
3.34 Goals against average 2.30
Expected goals, while he was in net
139.1 Expected goals against 134.3
-26.9 Goals saved above expected +6.3
-0.54 Saved above expected per 60 +0.11
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
-12.8 Goals above replacement +20.0
-2.1 Wins above replacement +3.3
Contract
$850K Cap hit $800K
-$962K Worth at the going rate $2.9M
-$1.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean