Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Brian Elliott Steve Mason

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.893, 9th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 3.02 a game, 4th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 28.2 shots a game, 48th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 55 games, 63rd percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.54 above expected per 60, 6th percentileSteve Mason: Save %, 0.901, 24th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.83 a game, 11th percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 28.5 shots a game, 52nd percentileSteve Mason: Games, 54 games, 57th percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, -0.46 above expected per 60, 11th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Brian Elliott G, TBL 2010-11 Steve Mason G, WPG
55 Games played 54
15 Wins 24
27 Losses 21
3 Shutouts 3
1,551 Shots against 1,541
1,385 Saves 1,388
166 Goals against 153
0.893 Save % 0.901
3.34 Goals against average 3.03
Expected goals, while he was in net
139.1 Expected goals against 130.0
-26.9 Goals saved above expected -23.0
-0.54 Saved above expected per 60 -0.46
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
-12.8 Goals above replacement -9.7
-2.1 Wins above replacement -1.6

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean