Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Cam Barker Alexander Sulzer

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCam Barker: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileCam Barker: Assists, 0.08 a game, 10th percentileCam Barker: Points, 0.10 a game, 9th percentileCam Barker: Shots, 0.85 a game, 28th percentileCam Barker: Hits, 1.31 a game, 55th percentileCam Barker: Corsi for %, 43.3%, 6th percentileCam Barker: CF% rel, -1.7, 37th percentileCam Barker: On-ice xG %, 43.3%, 6th percentileCam Barker: Rating, -2.8 goals above replacement, 8th percentileCam Barker: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 31st percentileCam Barker: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 23rd percentileCam Barker: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 36th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Goals, 0.03 a game, 28th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Assists, 0.10 a game, 17th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Points, 0.13 a game, 15th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Shots, 0.93 a game, 34th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Hits, 0.95 a game, 36th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Corsi for %, 49.9%, 49th percentileAlexander Sulzer: CF% rel, 0.2, 55th percentileAlexander Sulzer: On-ice xG %, 48.7%, 40th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 44th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Chances created, 0.15 xG per 60, 41st percentileAlexander Sulzer: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 46th percentileAlexander Sulzer: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0123452040Cam Barker 5Alexander Sulzer 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Cam Barker
Alexander Sulzer

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Cam Barker D, VAN 2010-11 Alexander Sulzer D, BUF
52 Games played 40
1 Goals 1
4 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.10 Points per game 0.13
-10 Plus/minus -8
44 Shots 37
2.3 Shooting % 2.7
68 Hits 38
34 Penalty minutes 14
16:24 Average ice time 17:33
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.3 Corsi for % 49.9
-1.7 CF% relative to team +0.2
43.3 Fenwick for % 49.2
43.3 Expected goals for % 48.7
-3.3 xGF% relative to team -0.5
39.1 Goals for % 43.2
99.0 PDO 99.1
76 Shot attempts taken 72
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 1.7
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.15
2.6% Chance per attempt 3.1%
-0.9 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-2.8 Goals above replacement +0.8
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.4 Even-strength offence -1.1
-2.2 Even-strength defence -0.6
-1.0 Power play -0.4
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.4 Penalties +0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean