Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Cam Barker Davis Drewiske

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerCam Barker: Goals, 0.02 a game, 20th percentileCam Barker: Assists, 0.08 a game, 10th percentileCam Barker: Points, 0.10 a game, 9th percentileCam Barker: Shots, 0.85 a game, 28th percentileCam Barker: Hits, 1.31 a game, 55th percentileCam Barker: Corsi for %, 43.3%, 6th percentileCam Barker: CF% rel, -1.7, 37th percentileCam Barker: On-ice xG %, 43.3%, 6th percentileCam Barker: Rating, -2.8 goals above replacement, 8th percentileCam Barker: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 31st percentileCam Barker: Shot quality, 2.6% a shot, 23rd percentileCam Barker: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 36th percentileDavis Drewiske: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileDavis Drewiske: Assists, 0.13 a game, 25th percentileDavis Drewiske: Points, 0.13 a game, 17th percentileDavis Drewiske: Shots, 0.71 a game, 16th percentileDavis Drewiske: Hits, 0.61 a game, 10th percentileDavis Drewiske: Corsi for %, 48.9%, 38th percentileDavis Drewiske: CF% rel, -3.0, 22nd percentileDavis Drewiske: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 45th percentileDavis Drewiske: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 41st percentileDavis Drewiske: Chances created, 0.11 xG per 60, 19th percentileDavis Drewiske: Shot quality, 2.7% a shot, 25th percentileDavis Drewiske: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 34th percentile
0123452040Cam Barker 5Davis Drewiske 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Cam Barker
Davis Drewiske

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Cam Barker D, VAN 2010-11 Davis Drewiske D, MTL
52 Games played 38
1 Goals 0
4 Assists 5
5 Points 5
0.10 Points per game 0.13
-10 Plus/minus -1
44 Shots 27
2.3 Shooting % 0.0
68 Hits 23
34 Penalty minutes 19
16:24 Average ice time 14:21
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.3 Corsi for % 48.9
-1.7 CF% relative to team -3.0
43.3 Fenwick for % 48.8
43.3 Expected goals for % 49.3
-3.3 xGF% relative to team -5.3
39.1 Goals for % 46.9
99.0 PDO 99.6
76 Shot attempts taken 65
Expected goals, all situations
1.9 Expected goals 1.0
0.13 Expected goals per 60 0.11
2.6% Chance per attempt 2.7%
-0.9 Goals above expected -1.0
Rating, in goals
-2.8 Goals above replacement +0.6
-0.5 Wins above replacement +0.1
-2.4 Even-strength offence -2.1
-2.2 Even-strength defence +1.2
-1.0 Power play -0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.5
-0.4 Penalties -0.7

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean