Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Rob Schremp Daniel Winnik

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Rob Schremp C, ATL		2010-11	Daniel Winnik L, MIN
	63	Games played	80
	13	Goals	11
	13	Assists	15
	26	Points	26
	0.41	Points per game	0.33
	-20	Plus/minus	-2
	83	Shots	167
	15.7	Shooting %	6.6
	34	Hits	54
	16	Penalty minutes	35
	14:02	Average ice time	16:33
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	46.1	Corsi for %	51.6
	-2.3	CF% relative to team	+5.9
	47.0	Fenwick for %	51.9
	42.2	Expected goals for %	51.9
	-4.0	xGF% relative to team	+3.9
	35.0	Goals for %	42.6
	95.6	PDO	97.5
	111	Shot attempts taken	231
Expected goals, all situations
	7.7	Expected goals	12.6
	0.52	Expected goals per 60	0.57
	6.5%	Chance per attempt	5.8%
	+5.3	Goals above expected	-1.6
Rating, in goals
	+1.4	Goals above replacement	+6.7
	+0.2	Wins above replacement	+1.1
	-3.2	Even-strength offence	-1.4
	+0.6	Even-strength defence	+3.6
	0.0	Power play	-0.2
	+0.0	Penalty kill	-0.4
	+1.6	Penalties	+1.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean