Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Justin Peters Chris Osgood

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerJustin Peters: Save %, 0.875, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 3.58 a game, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 28.6 shots a game, 56th percentileJustin Peters: Games, 12 games, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, -0.92 above expected per 60, 2nd percentileChris Osgood: Save %, 0.903, 28th percentileChris Osgood: Goals against, 2.64 a game, 26th percentileChris Osgood: Workload, 27.1 shots a game, 39th percentileChris Osgood: Games, 11 games, 1st percentileChris Osgood: Goals saved, -0.50 above expected per 60, 8th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Justin Peters G, ARI 2010-11 Chris Osgood G, DET
12 Games played 11
3 Wins 5
5 Losses 3
0 Shutouts 0
343 Shots against 298
300 Saves 269
43 Goals against 29
0.875 Save % 0.903
3.98 Goals against average 2.77
Expected goals, while he was in net
33.1 Expected goals against 23.7
-9.9 Goals saved above expected -5.3
-0.92 Saved above expected per 60 -0.50
7.0% Chance per attempt faced 6.0%
Rating, in goals
-6.5 Goals above replacement -2.8
-1.1 Wins above replacement -0.5

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean