Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Liam Reddox Brandon Segal

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLiam Reddox: Goals, 0.02 a game, 4th percentileLiam Reddox: Assists, 0.20 a game, 42nd percentileLiam Reddox: Points, 0.23 a game, 22nd percentileLiam Reddox: Shots, 1.93 a game, 58th percentileLiam Reddox: Hits, 1.73 a game, 78th percentileLiam Reddox: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 15th percentileLiam Reddox: CF% rel, -2.8, 25th percentileLiam Reddox: On-ice xG %, 49.1%, 40th percentileLiam Reddox: Rating, +3.5 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileLiam Reddox: Chances created, 0.73 xG per 60, 48th percentileLiam Reddox: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 52nd percentileLiam Reddox: Finishing, -7.0 goals above expected, 3rd percentileBrandon Segal: Goals, 0.11 a game, 29th percentileBrandon Segal: Assists, 0.11 a game, 18th percentileBrandon Segal: Points, 0.22 a game, 20th percentileBrandon Segal: Shots, 0.87 a game, 9th percentileBrandon Segal: Hits, 1.98 a game, 85th percentileBrandon Segal: Corsi for %, 46.4%, 16th percentileBrandon Segal: CF% rel, -2.1, 28th percentileBrandon Segal: On-ice xG %, 46.3%, 20th percentileBrandon Segal: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 19th percentileBrandon Segal: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 35th percentileBrandon Segal: Shot quality, 6.6% a shot, 27th percentileBrandon Segal: Finishing, +0.9 goals above expected, 60th percentile
02468102040Liam Reddox 10Brandon Segal 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Liam Reddox
Brandon Segal

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Liam Reddox L, EDM 2010-11 Brandon Segal R, NYR
44 Games played 46
1 Goals 5
9 Assists 5
10 Points 10
0.23 Points per game 0.22
-8 Plus/minus 0
85 Shots 40
1.2 Shooting % 12.5
76 Hits 91
20 Penalty minutes 41
15:00 Average ice time 8:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.3 Corsi for % 46.4
-2.8 CF% relative to team -2.1
46.5 Fenwick for % 46.4
49.1 Expected goals for % 46.3
+4.3 xGF% relative to team -2.9
34.4 Goals for % 51.9
95.5 PDO 102.5
114 Shot attempts taken 75
Expected goals, all situations
8.0 Expected goals 4.1
0.73 Expected goals per 60 0.64
7.4% Chance per attempt 6.6%
-7.0 Goals above expected +0.9
Rating, in goals
+3.5 Goals above replacement -0.2
+0.6 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.6 Even-strength offence -0.6
+1.5 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.2 Power play -0.2
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
+1.1 Penalties -0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean