Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Kevin Porter Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerKevin Porter: Goals, 0.19 a game, 55th percentileKevin Porter: Assists, 0.15 a game, 27th percentileKevin Porter: Points, 0.34 a game, 38th percentileKevin Porter: Shots, 1.38 a game, 31st percentileKevin Porter: Hits, 1.70 a game, 78th percentileKevin Porter: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 20th percentileKevin Porter: CF% rel, -0.3, 42nd percentileKevin Porter: On-ice xG %, 49.3%, 40th percentileKevin Porter: Rating, +0.5 goals above replacement, 26th percentileKevin Porter: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 34th percentileKevin Porter: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 46th percentileKevin Porter: Finishing, +3.1 goals above expected, 80th percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.13 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.19 a game, 37th percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.32 a game, 35th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.56 a game, 42nd percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 1.46 a game, 68th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 44th percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -2.8, 24th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 55.3%, 87th percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +7.0 goals above replacement, 75th percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 22nd percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 40th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.4 goals above expected, 16th percentile
0510152025204060Kevin Porter 25Nate Thompson 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Kevin Porter
Nate Thompson

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Kevin Porter C, PIT 2010-11 Nate Thompson C, PHI
74 Games played 79
14 Goals 10
11 Assists 15
25 Points 25
0.34 Points per game 0.32
-11 Plus/minus -6
102 Shots 123
13.7 Shooting % 8.1
126 Hits 115
27 Penalty minutes 29
13:49 Average ice time 15:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.9 Corsi for % 49.6
-0.3 CF% relative to team -2.8
47.9 Fenwick for % 53.3
49.3 Expected goals for % 55.3
+0.6 xGF% relative to team -0.3
44.8 Goals for % 42.4
99.0 PDO 96.5
165 Shot attempts taken 181
Expected goals, all situations
10.9 Expected goals 11.4
0.64 Expected goals per 60 0.57
7.2% Chance per attempt 7.1%
+3.1 Goals above expected -3.4
Rating, in goals
+0.5 Goals above replacement +7.0
+0.1 Wins above replacement +1.2
-1.0 Even-strength offence -1.4
+0.3 Even-strength defence +4.4
-0.9 Power play -0.1
+0.3 Penalty kill +0.5
-1.0 Penalties +0.3
Contract
$660K Cap hit $625K
$26K Cap dollars per point $25K
$714K Worth at the going rate $3.5M
+$54K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean