Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Adam Cracknell Bill Thomas

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Adam Cracknell R, ANA		2010-11	Bill Thomas R, FLA
	24	Games played	24
	3	Goals	4
	4	Assists	3
	7	Points	7
	0.29	Points per game	0.29
	1	Plus/minus	1
	26	Shots	33
	11.5	Shooting %	12.1
	29	Hits	19
	8	Penalty minutes	6
	8:55	Average ice time	8:30
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	48.5	Corsi for %	47.9
	-2.6	CF% relative to team	+0.6
	47.8	Fenwick for %	48.6
	39.2	Expected goals for %	47.8
	-12.2	xGF% relative to team	-2.5
	52.6	Goals for %	53.8
	101.3	PDO	100.9
	44	Shot attempts taken	46
Expected goals, all situations
	1.8	Expected goals	2.7
	0.51	Expected goals per 60	0.79
	4.8%	Chance per attempt	6.0%
	+1.2	Goals above expected	+1.3
Rating, in goals
	-0.1	Goals above replacement	+1.5
	0.0	Wins above replacement	+0.3
	-0.4	Even-strength offence	+0.1
	0.0	Even-strength defence	+0.5
	0.0	Power play	0.0
	+0.0	Penalty kill	+0.0
	-0.3	Penalties	+0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean