Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Mattias Ritola Andrew Murray

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMattias Ritola: Goals, 0.13 a game, 34th percentileMattias Ritola: Assists, 0.13 a game, 23rd percentileMattias Ritola: Points, 0.26 a game, 27th percentileMattias Ritola: Shots, 1.35 a game, 29th percentileMattias Ritola: Hits, 0.77 a game, 33rd percentileMattias Ritola: Corsi for %, 53.4%, 80th percentileMattias Ritola: CF% rel, 0.7, 53rd percentileMattias Ritola: On-ice xG %, 57.3%, 96th percentileMattias Ritola: Rating, +1.7 goals above replacement, 38th percentileMattias Ritola: Chances created, 0.84 xG per 60, 65th percentileMattias Ritola: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 62nd percentileMattias Ritola: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 45th percentileAndrew Murray: Goals, 0.14 a game, 37th percentileAndrew Murray: Assists, 0.14 a game, 25th percentileAndrew Murray: Points, 0.28 a game, 30th percentileAndrew Murray: Shots, 1.66 a game, 46th percentileAndrew Murray: Hits, 2.66 a game, 96th percentileAndrew Murray: Corsi for %, 53.0%, 74th percentileAndrew Murray: CF% rel, 2.8, 72nd percentileAndrew Murray: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 73rd percentileAndrew Murray: Rating, +2.6 goals above replacement, 47th percentileAndrew Murray: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 39th percentileAndrew Murray: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 20th percentileAndrew Murray: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
0246820Mattias Ritola 8Andrew Murray 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Mattias Ritola
Andrew Murray

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Mattias Ritola C, TBL 2010-11 Andrew Murray C, STL
31 Games played 29
4 Goals 4
4 Assists 4
8 Points 8
0.26 Points per game 0.28
-5 Plus/minus 2
42 Shots 48
9.5 Shooting % 8.3
24 Hits 77
11 Penalty minutes 4
10:04 Average ice time 11:23
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.4 Corsi for % 53.0
+0.7 CF% relative to team +2.8
53.8 Fenwick for % 52.6
57.3 Expected goals for % 53.0
+3.1 xGF% relative to team +2.3
42.9 Goals for % 50.0
96.3 PDO 99.1
61 Shot attempts taken 63
Expected goals, all situations
4.3 Expected goals 3.7
0.84 Expected goals per 60 0.68
7.8% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-0.3 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+1.7 Goals above replacement +2.6
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
+0.6 Even-strength offence -1.2
+0.5 Even-strength defence +1.9
-0.6 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.3 Penalties +0.7

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean