Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Carey Price Cam Ward

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerCarey Price: Save %, 0.923, 87th percentileCarey Price: Goals against, 2.29 a game, 67th percentileCarey Price: Workload, 29.8 shots a game, 78th percentileCarey Price: Games, 72 games, 96th percentileCarey Price: Goals saved, +0.31 above expected per 60, 79th percentileCam Ward: Save %, 0.923, 83rd percentileCam Ward: Goals against, 2.49 a game, 43rd percentileCam Ward: Workload, 32.1 shots a game, 98th percentileCam Ward: Games, 74 games, 98th percentileCam Ward: Goals saved, +0.50 above expected per 60, 91st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Carey Price G, MTL 2010-11 Cam Ward G, CHI
72 Games played 74
38 Wins 37
28 Losses 26
8 Shutouts 4
2,147 Shots against 2,375
1,982 Saves 2,191
165 Goals against 184
0.923 Save % 0.923
2.35 Goals against average 2.56
Expected goals, while he was in net
186.4 Expected goals against 219.9
+21.4 Goals saved above expected +35.9
+0.31 Saved above expected per 60 +0.50
6.4% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
+40.4 Goals above replacement +58.3
+6.7 Wins above replacement +9.7
Contract
$2.75M Cap hit $6.3M
$5.3M Worth at the going rate $7.4M
+$2.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean