Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Taylor Chorney Craig Rivet

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Taylor Chorney D, CBJ		2010-11	Craig Rivet D, CBJ
	12	Games played	37
	1	Goals	2
	3	Assists	2
	4	Points	4
	0.33	Points per game	0.11
	-5	Plus/minus	-12
	13	Shots	33
	7.7	Shooting %	6.1
	13	Hits	31
	4	Penalty minutes	35
	15:59	Average ice time	14:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	43.8	Corsi for %	49.7
	-5.5	CF% relative to team	-2.3
	40.9	Fenwick for %	49.3
	37.8	Expected goals for %	51.1
	-8.7	xGF% relative to team	-2.7
	33.3	Goals for %	41.5
	96.0	PDO	96.6
	23	Shot attempts taken	57
Expected goals, all situations
	0.7	Expected goals	1.3
	0.23	Expected goals per 60	0.15
	4.1%	Chance per attempt	2.8%
	+0.3	Goals above expected	+0.7
Rating, in goals
	-0.9	Goals above replacement	-1.4
	-0.2	Wins above replacement	-0.2
	-0.8	Even-strength offence	-0.5
	-0.5	Even-strength defence	-0.9
	0.0	Power play	-0.4
	0.0	Penalty kill	+0.0
	-0.1	Penalties	-1.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean