Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Colin Greening Daniel Paille

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerColin Greening: Goals, 0.25 a game, 70th percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.29 a game, 61st percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.54 a game, 65th percentileColin Greening: Shots, 2.38 a game, 75th percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.33 a game, 92nd percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 53rd percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, 4.1, 85th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 32nd percentileColin Greening: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 1.00 xG per 60, 87th percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 71st percentileColin Greening: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 49th percentileDaniel Paille: Goals, 0.14 a game, 38th percentileDaniel Paille: Assists, 0.16 a game, 30th percentileDaniel Paille: Points, 0.30 a game, 32nd percentileDaniel Paille: Shots, 1.12 a game, 18th percentileDaniel Paille: Hits, 0.56 a game, 20th percentileDaniel Paille: Corsi for %, 47.8%, 26th percentileDaniel Paille: CF% rel, -5.2, 9th percentileDaniel Paille: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 35th percentileDaniel Paille: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 42nd percentileDaniel Paille: Chances created, 0.64 xG per 60, 35th percentileDaniel Paille: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 77th percentileDaniel Paille: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 58th percentile
05102040Colin Greening 13Daniel Paille 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Colin Greening
Daniel Paille

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Colin Greening C, TOR 2010-11 Daniel Paille L, NYR
24 Games played 43
6 Goals 6
7 Assists 7
13 Points 13
0.54 Points per game 0.30
2 Plus/minus 3
57 Shots 48
10.5 Shooting % 12.5
56 Hits 24
10 Penalty minutes 28
15:05 Average ice time 11:18
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.3 Corsi for % 47.8
+4.1 CF% relative to team -5.2
50.4 Fenwick for % 48.7
48.1 Expected goals for % 48.8
+3.1 xGF% relative to team -2.8
53.3 Goals for % 53.3
100.9 PDO 101.4
82 Shot attempts taken 68
Expected goals, all situations
6.0 Expected goals 5.2
1.00 Expected goals per 60 0.64
8.0% Chance per attempt 8.3%
0.0 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
+2.0 Goals above replacement +2.1
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.3
+2.3 Even-strength offence +0.1
-1.4 Even-strength defence +0.4
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.4 Penalties +0.2

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean