Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Peter Harrold Taylor Chorney

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Harrold: Goals, 0.05 a game, 55th percentilePeter Harrold: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentilePeter Harrold: Points, 0.21 a game, 40th percentilePeter Harrold: Shots, 0.63 a game, 11th percentilePeter Harrold: Hits, 0.26 a game, 1st percentilePeter Harrold: Corsi for %, 57.8%, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: CF% rel, 7.5, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: On-ice xG %, 58.4%, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentilePeter Harrold: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 74th percentilePeter Harrold: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 94th percentilePeter Harrold: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 59th percentileTaylor Chorney: Goals, 0.08 a game, 72nd percentileTaylor Chorney: Assists, 0.25 a game, 65th percentileTaylor Chorney: Points, 0.33 a game, 67th percentileTaylor Chorney: Shots, 1.08 a game, 45th percentileTaylor Chorney: Hits, 1.08 a game, 45th percentileTaylor Chorney: Corsi for %, 43.8%, 7th percentileTaylor Chorney: CF% rel, -5.5, 7th percentileTaylor Chorney: On-ice xG %, 37.8%, 1st percentileTaylor Chorney: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 24th percentileTaylor Chorney: Chances created, 0.23 xG per 60, 71st percentileTaylor Chorney: Shot quality, 4.1% a shot, 87th percentileTaylor Chorney: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 62nd percentile
01234Peter Harrold 4Taylor Chorney 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Harrold
Taylor Chorney

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Harrold D, NJD 2010-11 Taylor Chorney D, CBJ
19 Games played 12
1 Goals 1
3 Assists 3
4 Points 4
0.21 Points per game 0.33
3 Plus/minus -5
12 Shots 13
8.3 Shooting % 7.7
5 Hits 13
4 Penalty minutes 4
12:15 Average ice time 15:59
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
57.8 Corsi for % 43.8
+7.5 CF% relative to team -5.5
58.5 Fenwick for % 40.9
58.4 Expected goals for % 37.8
+8.8 xGF% relative to team -8.7
64.3 Goals for % 33.3
102.6 PDO 96.0
26 Shot attempts taken 23
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 0.7
0.24 Expected goals per 60 0.23
4.4% Chance per attempt 4.1%
+0.1 Goals above expected +0.3
Rating, in goals
+1.9 Goals above replacement -0.9
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.2
+0.8 Even-strength offence -0.8
+0.7 Even-strength defence -0.5
-0.2 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.3 Penalties -0.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean