Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Peter Harrold Ian Cole

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPeter Harrold: Goals, 0.05 a game, 55th percentilePeter Harrold: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentilePeter Harrold: Points, 0.21 a game, 40th percentilePeter Harrold: Shots, 0.63 a game, 11th percentilePeter Harrold: Hits, 0.26 a game, 1st percentilePeter Harrold: Corsi for %, 57.8%, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: CF% rel, 7.5, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: On-ice xG %, 58.4%, 99th percentilePeter Harrold: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 56th percentilePeter Harrold: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 74th percentilePeter Harrold: Shot quality, 4.4% a shot, 94th percentilePeter Harrold: Finishing, +0.1 goals above expected, 59th percentileIan Cole: Goals, 0.04 a game, 40th percentileIan Cole: Assists, 0.12 a game, 20th percentileIan Cole: Points, 0.15 a game, 24th percentileIan Cole: Shots, 0.85 a game, 28th percentileIan Cole: Hits, 1.38 a game, 58th percentileIan Cole: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 70th percentileIan Cole: CF% rel, -1.0, 43rd percentileIan Cole: On-ice xG %, 50.1%, 53rd percentileIan Cole: Rating, -0.3 goals above replacement, 29th percentileIan Cole: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 52nd percentileIan Cole: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 69th percentileIan Cole: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 50th percentile
0123420Peter Harrold 4Ian Cole 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Peter Harrold
Ian Cole

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Peter Harrold D, NJD 2010-11 Ian Cole D, CHI
19 Games played 26
1 Goals 1
3 Assists 3
4 Points 4
0.21 Points per game 0.15
3 Plus/minus 6
12 Shots 22
8.3 Shooting % 4.5
5 Hits 36
4 Penalty minutes 35
12:15 Average ice time 17:36
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
57.8 Corsi for % 51.3
+7.5 CF% relative to team -1.0
58.5 Fenwick for % 52.0
58.4 Expected goals for % 50.1
+8.8 xGF% relative to team +2.0
64.3 Goals for % 58.1
102.6 PDO 101.9
26 Shot attempts taken 49
Expected goals, all situations
0.9 Expected goals 1.4
0.24 Expected goals per 60 0.18
4.4% Chance per attempt 3.6%
+0.1 Goals above expected -0.4
Rating, in goals
+1.9 Goals above replacement -0.3
+0.3 Wins above replacement 0.0
+0.8 Even-strength offence -0.7
+0.7 Even-strength defence +0.3
-0.2 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.3 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$583K Cap hit $875K
$146K Cap dollars per point $219K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean