Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Chris Stewart Nathan Horton

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerChris Stewart: Goals, 0.45 a game, 98th percentileChris Stewart: Assists, 0.40 a game, 81st percentileChris Stewart: Points, 0.85 a game, 91st percentileChris Stewart: Shots, 2.61 a game, 83rd percentileChris Stewart: Hits, 0.90 a game, 41st percentileChris Stewart: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 47th percentileChris Stewart: CF% rel, 0.1, 46th percentileChris Stewart: On-ice xG %, 53.8%, 77th percentileChris Stewart: Rating, +8.2 goals above replacement, 81st percentileChris Stewart: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 74th percentileChris Stewart: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 63rd percentileChris Stewart: Finishing, +11.9 goals above expected, 98th percentileNathan Horton: Goals, 0.33 a game, 86th percentileNathan Horton: Assists, 0.34 a game, 70th percentileNathan Horton: Points, 0.66 a game, 78th percentileNathan Horton: Shots, 2.35 a game, 74th percentileNathan Horton: Hits, 0.93 a game, 42nd percentileNathan Horton: Corsi for %, 54.5%, 88th percentileNathan Horton: CF% rel, 5.3, 91st percentileNathan Horton: On-ice xG %, 53.4%, 75th percentileNathan Horton: Rating, +8.0 goals above replacement, 79th percentileNathan Horton: Chances created, 0.97 xG per 60, 84th percentileNathan Horton: Shot quality, 8.1% a shot, 73rd percentileNathan Horton: Finishing, +4.9 goals above expected, 88th percentile
0204020406080Chris Stewart 53Nathan Horton 53

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Chris Stewart
Nathan Horton

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Chris Stewart R, PHI 2010-11 Nathan Horton R, CBJ
62 Games played 80
28 Goals 26
25 Assists 27
53 Points 53
0.85 Points per game 0.66
-6 Plus/minus 29
162 Shots 188
17.3 Shooting % 13.8
56 Hits 74
53 Penalty minutes 85
17:29 Average ice time 16:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.8 Corsi for % 54.5
+0.1 CF% relative to team +5.3
51.1 Fenwick for % 53.5
53.8 Expected goals for % 53.4
+2.1 xGF% relative to team +6.1
52.6 Goals for % 64.0
100.3 PDO 103.8
175 Shot attempts taken 250
Expected goals, all situations
16.1 Expected goals 21.1
0.89 Expected goals per 60 0.97
7.8% Chance per attempt 8.1%
+11.9 Goals above expected +4.9
Rating, in goals
+8.2 Goals above replacement +8.0
+1.4 Wins above replacement +1.3
+4.1 Even-strength offence +6.2
-0.9 Even-strength defence -1.2
+1.8 Power play -0.4
-0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.2 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$2.875M Cap hit $4M
$54K Cap dollars per point $75K
$4M Worth at the going rate $3.9M
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$104K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean