Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Sam Gagner Ales Hemsky

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSam Gagner: Goals, 0.22 a game, 63rd percentileSam Gagner: Assists, 0.40 a game, 80th percentileSam Gagner: Points, 0.62 a game, 73rd percentileSam Gagner: Shots, 2.03 a game, 62nd percentileSam Gagner: Hits, 0.35 a game, 8th percentileSam Gagner: Corsi for %, 48.0%, 27th percentileSam Gagner: CF% rel, 3.1, 75th percentileSam Gagner: On-ice xG %, 45.6%, 15th percentileSam Gagner: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileSam Gagner: Chances created, 0.75 xG per 60, 52nd percentileSam Gagner: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 66th percentileSam Gagner: Finishing, -1.0 goals above expected, 39th percentileAles Hemsky: Goals, 0.30 a game, 82nd percentileAles Hemsky: Assists, 0.60 a game, 95th percentileAles Hemsky: Points, 0.89 a game, 95th percentileAles Hemsky: Shots, 2.13 a game, 66th percentileAles Hemsky: Hits, 0.62 a game, 22nd percentileAles Hemsky: Corsi for %, 46.7%, 18th percentileAles Hemsky: CF% rel, 1.6, 61st percentileAles Hemsky: On-ice xG %, 44.8%, 12th percentileAles Hemsky: Rating, +4.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileAles Hemsky: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 41st percentileAles Hemsky: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 48th percentileAles Hemsky: Finishing, +2.2 goals above expected, 73rd percentile
010203040204060Sam Gagner 42Ales Hemsky 42

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Sam Gagner
Ales Hemsky

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Sam Gagner C, EDM 2010-11 Ales Hemsky R, MTL
68 Games played 47
15 Goals 14
27 Assists 28
42 Points 42
0.62 Points per game 0.89
-17 Plus/minus 3
138 Shots 100
10.9 Shooting % 14.0
24 Hits 29
37 Penalty minutes 18
17:45 Average ice time 18:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
48.0 Corsi for % 46.7
+3.1 CF% relative to team +1.6
47.3 Fenwick for % 46.0
45.6 Expected goals for % 44.8
+2.1 xGF% relative to team +3.2
42.9 Goals for % 49.2
97.8 PDO 101.1
180 Shot attempts taken 129
Expected goals, all situations
15.0 Expected goals 9.8
0.75 Expected goals per 60 0.68
7.9% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-1.0 Goals above expected +2.2
Rating, in goals
+4.1 Goals above replacement +4.1
+0.7 Wins above replacement +0.7
+1.9 Even-strength offence +3.2
-1.4 Even-strength defence -1.8
-0.4 Power play -0.1
-0.3 Penalty kill -0.4
+0.8 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$2.275M Cap hit $4.1M
$54K Cap dollars per point $98K
$2.2M Worth at the going rate $2.2M
-$49K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.9M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean