Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Anders Lindback Mike Smith

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerAnders Lindback: Save %, 0.915, 54th percentileAnders Lindback: Goals against, 2.23 a game, 80th percentileAnders Lindback: Workload, 26.2 shots a game, 19th percentileAnders Lindback: Games, 22 games, 4th percentileAnders Lindback: Goals saved, -0.14 above expected per 60, 40th percentileMike Smith: Save %, 0.899, 20th percentileMike Smith: Goals against, 2.64 a game, 26th percentileMike Smith: Workload, 26.2 shots a game, 19th percentileMike Smith: Games, 22 games, 4th percentileMike Smith: Goals saved, -0.63 above expected per 60, 4th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Anders Lindback G, NSH 2010-11 Mike Smith G, EDM
22 Games played 22
11 Wins 13
5 Losses 6
2 Shutouts 1
576 Shots against 576
527 Saves 518
49 Goals against 58
0.915 Save % 0.899
2.60 Goals against average 2.89
Expected goals, while he was in net
46.4 Expected goals against 45.4
-2.6 Goals saved above expected -12.6
-0.14 Saved above expected per 60 -0.63
5.8% Chance per attempt faced 5.7%
Rating, in goals
+2.1 Goals above replacement -7.9
+0.4 Wins above replacement -1.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean