Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Peter Mannino Mike McKenna

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerPeter Mannino: Save %, 0.861, 1st percentilePeter Mannino: Goals against, 2.50 a game, 41st percentilePeter Mannino: Workload, 18.0 shots a game, 1st percentilePeter Mannino: Games, 2 games, 1st percentilePeter Mannino: Goals saved, -1.41 above expected per 60, 1st percentileMike McKenna: Save %, 0.893, 9th percentileMike McKenna: Goals against, 3.00 a game, 6th percentileMike McKenna: Workload, 28.0 shots a game, 46th percentileMike McKenna: Games, 2 games, 1st percentileMike McKenna: Goals saved, -0.31 above expected per 60, 26th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Peter Mannino G, WPG 2010-11 Mike McKenna G, PHI
2 Games played 2
0 Wins 0
0 Losses 1
0 Shutouts 0
36 Shots against 56
31 Saves 50
5 Goals against 6
0.861 Save % 0.893
4.12 Goals against average 3.05
Expected goals, while he was in net
3.3 Expected goals against 5.4
-1.7 Goals saved above expected -0.6
-1.41 Saved above expected per 60 -0.31
6.9% Chance per attempt faced 6.8%
Rating, in goals
-1.4 Goals above replacement -0.1
-0.2 Wins above replacement 0.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean