Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nathan Lawson Ray Emery

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerNathan Lawson: Save %, 0.893, 11th percentileNathan Lawson: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 28th percentileNathan Lawson: Workload, 24.3 shots a game, 9th percentileNathan Lawson: Games, 10 games, 1st percentileNathan Lawson: Goals saved, -0.05 above expected per 60, 49th percentileRay Emery: Save %, 0.926, 93rd percentileRay Emery: Goals against, 2.00 a game, 96th percentileRay Emery: Workload, 27.2 shots a game, 41st percentileRay Emery: Games, 10 games, 1st percentileRay Emery: Goals saved, +0.24 above expected per 60, 75th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Nathan Lawson G, OTT 2010-11 Ray Emery G, PHI
10 Games played 10
1 Wins 7
4 Losses 2
0 Shutouts 0
243 Shots against 272
217 Saves 252
26 Goals against 20
0.893 Save % 0.926
4.06 Goals against average 2.28
Expected goals, while he was in net
25.7 Expected goals against 22.1
-0.3 Goals saved above expected +2.1
-0.05 Saved above expected per 60 +0.24
7.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.4%
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement +4.4
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.7

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean