Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nathan Lawson Justin Peters

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerNathan Lawson: Save %, 0.893, 11th percentileNathan Lawson: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 28th percentileNathan Lawson: Workload, 24.3 shots a game, 9th percentileNathan Lawson: Games, 10 games, 1st percentileNathan Lawson: Goals saved, -0.05 above expected per 60, 49th percentileJustin Peters: Save %, 0.875, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals against, 3.58 a game, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Workload, 28.6 shots a game, 56th percentileJustin Peters: Games, 12 games, 1st percentileJustin Peters: Goals saved, -0.92 above expected per 60, 2nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 54 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Nathan Lawson G, OTT 2010-11 Justin Peters G, ARI
10 Games played 12
1 Wins 3
4 Losses 5
0 Shutouts 0
243 Shots against 343
217 Saves 300
26 Goals against 43
0.893 Save % 0.875
4.06 Goals against average 3.98
Expected goals, while he was in net
25.7 Expected goals against 33.1
-0.3 Goals saved above expected -9.9
-0.05 Saved above expected per 60 -0.92
7.9% Chance per attempt faced 7.0%
Rating, in goals
+2.3 Goals above replacement -6.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement -1.1

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean