Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Dan Sexton Colin Greening

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerDan Sexton: Goals, 0.09 a game, 22nd percentileDan Sexton: Assists, 0.19 a game, 37th percentileDan Sexton: Points, 0.28 a game, 30th percentileDan Sexton: Shots, 1.66 a game, 47th percentileDan Sexton: Hits, 0.62 a game, 22nd percentileDan Sexton: Corsi for %, 43.0%, 5th percentileDan Sexton: CF% rel, -3.2, 21st percentileDan Sexton: On-ice xG %, 43.2%, 8th percentileDan Sexton: Rating, +1.3 goals above replacement, 34th percentileDan Sexton: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 28th percentileDan Sexton: Shot quality, 5.0% a shot, 1st percentileDan Sexton: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 35th percentileColin Greening: Goals, 0.25 a game, 70th percentileColin Greening: Assists, 0.29 a game, 61st percentileColin Greening: Points, 0.54 a game, 65th percentileColin Greening: Shots, 2.38 a game, 75th percentileColin Greening: Hits, 2.33 a game, 92nd percentileColin Greening: Corsi for %, 50.3%, 53rd percentileColin Greening: CF% rel, 4.1, 85th percentileColin Greening: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 32nd percentileColin Greening: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 41st percentileColin Greening: Chances created, 1.00 xG per 60, 87th percentileColin Greening: Shot quality, 8.0% a shot, 71st percentileColin Greening: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 49th percentile
05102040Dan Sexton 13Colin Greening 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Dan Sexton
Colin Greening

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Dan Sexton R, ANA 2010-11 Colin Greening C, TOR
47 Games played 24
4 Goals 6
9 Assists 7
13 Points 13
0.28 Points per game 0.54
-6 Plus/minus 2
78 Shots 57
5.1 Shooting % 10.5
29 Hits 56
4 Penalty minutes 10
11:35 Average ice time 15:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.0 Corsi for % 50.3
-3.2 CF% relative to team +4.1
45.5 Fenwick for % 50.4
43.2 Expected goals for % 48.1
-2.9 xGF% relative to team +3.1
37.5 Goals for % 53.3
97.2 PDO 100.9
105 Shot attempts taken 82
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 6.0
0.60 Expected goals per 60 1.00
5.0% Chance per attempt 8.0%
-1.4 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+1.3 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.3
-1.3 Even-strength offence +2.3
+0.1 Even-strength defence -1.4
+0.1 Power play -0.1
+0.0 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.9 Penalties +0.4

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean