Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Drew Bagnall

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI		2010-11	Drew Bagnall D, MIN
	2	Games played	2
	0	Goals	0
	0	Assists	0
	0	Points	0
	0.00	Points per game	0.00
	0	Plus/minus	-2
	1	Shots	1
	0.0	Shooting %	0.0
	0	Hits	0
	0	Penalty minutes	4
	14:48	Average ice time	13:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	58.5	Corsi for %	34.4
	+3.1	CF% relative to team	-17.0
	54.5	Fenwick for %	27.3
	57.8	Expected goals for %	22.8
	+11.8	xGF% relative to team	-33.0
	0.0	Goals for %	0.0
	100.0	PDO	77.8
	3	Shot attempts taken	2
Expected goals, all situations
	0.1	Expected goals	0.0
	0.17	Expected goals per 60	0.07
	4.2%	Chance per attempt	3.0%
	-0.1	Goals above expected	0.0
Rating, in goals
	+0.2	Goals above replacement	-0.6
	+0.0	Wins above replacement	-0.1
	-0.1	Even-strength offence	-0.3
	+0.2	Even-strength defence	-0.1
	0.0	Power play	0.0
	0.0	Penalty kill	-0.2
	+0.0	Penalties	-0.2

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean