Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2010-11 season

At a glance

Nate Prosser Brendon Nash

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Prosser: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Shots, 0.50 a game, 4th percentileNate Prosser: Hits, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Prosser: Corsi for %, 58.5%, 99th percentileNate Prosser: CF% rel, 3.1, 87th percentileNate Prosser: On-ice xG %, 57.8%, 97th percentileNate Prosser: Rating, +0.2 goals above replacement, 35th percentileNate Prosser: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 50th percentileNate Prosser: Shot quality, 4.2% a shot, 91st percentileNate Prosser: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 54th percentileBrendon Nash: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Points, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrendon Nash: Shots, 1.00 a game, 39th percentileBrendon Nash: Hits, 0.50 a game, 7th percentileBrendon Nash: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 51st percentileBrendon Nash: CF% rel, -5.7, 4th percentileBrendon Nash: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 73rd percentileBrendon Nash: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 35th percentileBrendon Nash: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 23rd percentileBrendon Nash: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 3rd percentileBrendon Nash: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 54th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Nate Prosser 0Brendon Nash 0

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Prosser
Brendon Nash

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Prosser D, PHI 2010-11 Brendon Nash D, MTL
2 Games played 2
0 Goals 0
0 Assists 0
0 Points 0
0.00 Points per game 0.00
0 Plus/minus -1
1 Shots 2
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
0 Hits 1
0 Penalty minutes 0
14:48 Average ice time 10:12
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
58.5 Corsi for % 50.0
+3.1 CF% relative to team -5.7
54.5 Fenwick for % 52.9
57.8 Expected goals for % 52.1
+11.8 xGF% relative to team -6.4
0.0 Goals for % 0.0
100.0 PDO 85.7
3 Shot attempts taken 4
Expected goals, all situations
0.1 Expected goals 0.0
0.17 Expected goals per 60 0.12
4.2% Chance per attempt 2.0%
-0.1 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+0.2 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
+0.2 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean